Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus
IM glad he is back playing better but the first highlight was almost a major **** up, they are damn lucky the WR didn't catch the ball they tipped right to him in the EZ.
The first INT looked like he was fielding a punt that wasn't a skill play by any means then he runs around holding the ball extended in one hand like an idiot.
Ragland actually punched the ball out on the fumble.
2nd INT was a nice play.
|
Well. I mean, apart from just about every part of this post being factually inaccurate, I guess you've got a point.
Sorensen had the spatial awareness of a toddler most of then night. That's a pick if Dirty Dan just stays the hell out of the way. To whatever extent you're trying to criticize Peters for having perfect position for a red zone interception, I guess you're going to have to explain to me what else he could've done.
Ragland
didn't punch that ball out. Peters pulled it out and Ragland delievered a hit as the ball was coming free to ensure that the WR couldn't pull it back in, but that was Peters that created that fumble.
On the first interception, you realize that wasn't Peters man, right? Parker was on him and Peters was covering Allen. Peters read the play, saw what was happening and peeled off to provide the support that made that play look worse than it was. Peters did a great job diagnosing and tracking that ball.
Do better next time.