Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020
|

see? The Fonz gets it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
This is what it comes down to. If Peters didn’t have all these issues and we traded him for almost anything, I’d be up in arms. Veach fleeced Washington a couple weeks ago which looks more amazing in hindsight given that we got Fuller back (rather than just picks), which gives us a viable replacement for Peters at corner (since clearly Veach knew Peters was gone) and perhaps as importantly might tilt the odds in our favor of signing his brother.
Veach is playing checkers instead of chess yet people think he’s just throwing Peters away for no reason.
|
Exactly, Veach ate the Redskins lunch... so to assume he is being snookered here is highly improbable
Fact is almost NO ONE wanted a perennial Pro Bowl corner, and those that did entertain the idea were only willing to do so for relative peanuts... if that doesnt clue the doubters in on just how poorly Peters is regarded around the league, then nothing will