Quote:
Originally Posted by RealSNR
Not sure how or why Houston is being brought up as this glorious example of being cautious with extensions when it comes to players with an injury history. Houston didn't really have one to speak of before his extension.
The horrific injury that has sidelined him for the better part of 1.5 years can't be chalked up or even correlated to any kind of injury history. And you can say all you want that he's not at all the same player that he once was, but that's only because in the one full season in which he was mostly healthy, Bob ****ing Sutton let the opposing offenses dictate when Houston would rush or when he would drop into coverage.
Was he worth the contract he signed? Of course ****ing not. But if you're going to claim that we should have seen it coming, that's kind of bullshit. Sure, you can claim $100 million wasn't right because he just wasn't going to ever replicate 22 sacks again, but the injury he had was not predictable.
|
thats not at all what the claim was so you wrote a big giant paragraph for nothing