View Single Post
Old 04-14-2018, 12:03 PM   #10877
JDKinman JDKinman is offline
Starter
 
JDKinman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: In an airplane hangar
Casino cash: $10000400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfcan View Post
Another great post! I really enjoy your takes on football- excellent!

I am intrigued with getting a receiver that Mahomes has such a long history with. These two can probably finish each other's sentences. So what round do you think the Chiefs should draft him? And would it be worth it to take him a round earlier than projected, just because of the great connection and history between the two?
Color me crazy, but if the Chiefs made it their mission to sign Cantrell, I have little doubt that the Chiefs' offense would be a literal re-make of the Cowboys dominant offense of the early 90s.

Hunt provides the ground game, Hill is the constant deep threat and guy who requires double-coverage. We're two-deep at tight end and both are also excellent blockers.

Add Cantrell to the mix and defensive coordinators will go nuts trying to figure out who to double-team: Hill or Cantrell. In the meanwhile, that frees up our tight end and/or allows the receivers to spread the field and when you do THAT with a Kareem Hunt and Patrick Mahomes in the backfield. . .

I'll also be interested to see how Jace Amaro does with KC and Mahomes. Amaro was a monster during his years at Tech and was virtually unstoppable. From day one in the NFL, he was never used even close in a way that would maximize his potential. While he and Mahomes never played together, they played under the same system, so there will be familiarity.

This is going to be a fun season to watch.

JD
Posts: 56
JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.JDKinman would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote