So, just because other teams in the league do it that makes prevent D an acceptable scheme regardless of the fact that our players **** it up damn near every time? I propose an alternative: just run the defense that has gotten you the best results throughout the whole game. Our players don't seem to have as much of a problem doing that.
Pittsburgh game is a good example. 2nd quarter we go into prevent, give up 21 points. Bob Sutton adjusts back to what worked in the 1st quarter. It works in quarters 3 and 4. Is it really that complicated?
|