Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate
Well how many ****ing times can we give our opinion on either trading or not trading for this piece of shit?
Okay:
"I am against this trade for the reported compensation which Seattle is requesting, and also because this guy likes to decorate the ladies faces with blood".
Now, If you'd like me to repeat that 20 more times throughout the course of this thread, just copy and paste the above and keep yourself entertained to your heart's delight.
|
How anyone could be ok bringing on another known abuser is baffling. I see zero chance we do that. You don't get rid of Hunt and discuss dealing Hill only to bring on this guy who seems like a real piece of work even aside from the abuse issues. Being way to expensive and to much compensation makes this deal off the table that much more.