Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOp
I'm tired talking about "what ifs"...if Hill is a chronic child abuser, he'll be gone.
We dont know yet if Hill even is responsible...or the circumstances that caused the injury.
To me, the word "abuse" means deliberate intent to harm. I wish people would just quit throwing it out so loosely...
When Peterson beat his kid bloody with a switch...he was DELIBERATELY trying to inflict harm, it was intentional and premeditated.
If Hill intentionally broke his sons arm in an attempt to inflict bodily injury...he'll get convicted.
|
This isn't even close to the same situation as AP. You keep looking at this situation on its own. The question isn't if this was child abuse. The question is if this behavior shows a pattern that makes him a danger to his girlfriend, his son, and even if he dumps crystal let's be real... Does anyone really think dumping his gf or losing child custody means he won't abuse other women or some other child in the future?
What weve learned is that despite hill going through A LOT of anger management and therapy, That audio revealed that he isn't reformed at all. He's still the same monster that was capable of abusing a pregnant woman. And he always will be. He will be suspended by the league for a long time even with what little we know. He'll be an enormous distraction. And no team will want to give a long term deal to a player who not only is one tiny mistake away from a permaban, but is totally incapable of avoiding that mistake.