Quote:
Originally Posted by jettio
Perjury would have to be under oath.
Seems like she is talking about early interviews and unlikely that is under oath.
I think Kansas obstruction of justice could be untruthfulness in a police or agency interview.
Seems like she is saying that she was not there when arm injury happened and Tyreek seems to never have admitted to her that the injury was his fault, so if she was untruthful about the other corporal punishment that she disapproves of and that Tyreek thinks "teaches respect." that seems like misdemeanor level, at worse.
Considering that a child in need of care case is addressing the day to day life of the kid, seems like prosecuting her would be a lot of DA time that is motivated by the fame of the defendants and not doing much good for anyone.
I think the only way she testifies against him is if they break up, and not sure she would be a very good witness or that she would want to be. If they broke up and she genuinely objected to Tyreek's parenting, I would guess her lawyer would negotiate a favorable parenting plan with Tyreek's lawyer to propose to the court when the Child in Need of Care case wraps up.
|
Yeah I realized that after I posted it. Sorry about that. Still, if they can't charge her separately and no oath has been broken, she would be wise to ride it out with Tyreek, get coached by the lawyers, and keep her testimony to a minimum.