|
Best case scenario for Tyreek is that he’s not charged and he is punished for what he says on the tape.
Someone clearly believes he did it — but the police and CPS would have asked his son if he said Tyreek did it and one presumes they were left with enough doubt to not charge. What’s bizarre is if his fiancé just wanted him to fry she’d testify against him, support what her son was saying (though the tape makes it pretty clear that she wasn’t a direct witness to anything), and testify against him. And if she’s not out to fry him (or, put another way, if she’s out to protect him), why make this tape in the first place as “insurance” and then give it to someone else who could then release it whether you want it released or not? If you’re the party that wants Tyreek to go down (justifies or not), why are you holding on to something waiting for him to be charged rather than just letting the police have it? None of these motivations make any sense, they conflict with one another, and all the games on the part of the anti-Tyreek participants in this event seem so unnecessary. Tyreek is going to pay for what he said on the tape regardless of any other outcomes but the whole thing is just bizarre and even those who claim to have the child’s best interest at heart (where the focus really should be) seem to be avoiding actions that would lead in the straightest line to some sort of help for the kid.
|