Quote:
Originally Posted by RubberSponge
Well that exortion didn't work out too well. Biggest flaw in your theory is how an extortion attempt with the recording would adversely affect his future earnings potential if it became public. His ability to make another dime in the NFL is up for grabs at this point. People don't extort broke child abusers.
|
She didn't record it to extort/manipulate him BEFORE he gets paid...remember they arent married. If he breaks up with her...he's only financially responsible for his children. They weren't together when this whole thing started...and IMO, part of the motivation in the first place. I'm sure his contract would have a lot of caveats..and out clauses. The whole "if you dont support ME also...My friend will release a copy to the press and neither of us will have money. I'll ruin your career...and you'll still have to support the children." or it could be just to control/manipulate him. Which option do think Hill would take? Neither one of these people are very bright..
It's why the timing of the release made no sense. If she has dirt on Hill and covered for him...and they just received a "no charges" verdict...there would have been no point in covering for him in the first place... if she was planning on releasing a tape. She could have just given it to the DA from the beginning.
Her friend gave KCTV5 the recording...and sold her out.