Quote:
Originally Posted by Eleazar
He plead guilty and paid the penalty for 2014, that matter from a legal standpoint is resolved. But CP can't go around claiming he was innocent back then when he said the opposite, even though we would all feel better if he hadn't abused her.
And with respect to the Star piece, they just pointed out that it's typical for even admitted abusers to later claim, and sometimes truly believe, that they never did anything wrong. Doesn't necessarily mean that describes Hill, but it's still true.
|
No one here is saying that this isn't true, so why do you keep fighting that straw man? The point is that the editorial board slanted the narrative without saying anything whatsoever about any of the factors that don't make Hill "look even worse." Because doing that would not generate a sexy, click-worthy headline.