Quote:
Originally Posted by Eleazar
He plead guilty and paid the penalty for 2014, that matter from a legal standpoint is resolved. But CP can't go around claiming he was innocent back then when he said the opposite, even though we would all feel better if he hadn't abused her.
And with respect to the Star piece, they just pointed out that it's typical for even admitted abusers to later claim, and sometimes truly believe, that they never did anything wrong. Doesn't necessarily mean that describes Hill, but it's still true.
|
Plain and simple. The article is a character assassination on Hill to justify their overall bad reporting on the recent issue, which looks to not be anywhere close to everything they made it out to be or it wanted it to be.