A couple of points. They say it is typical for an abuser to deny... Why also didn't they say it's typical for an abuser's behavior not to change. Hill had no history of his abuse before OKC 2014 and he has had none since. That doesn't jive with their narrative.
I also love the liberal editorial board not understanding what most conservatives even get: We do have a two tiered justice system and if you are black and out of money and relegated to a public defender after being accused of punching and choking your pregnant girlfriend in Oklahoma, you plea, especially if it is expunged after 3 years and your are 19.
Also, if the evidence of this abuse in 2014 was concrete and graphic, do you think the prosecutor goes with this being expunged after 3 years, or should it be on his record?
Also do you think the judge would have said what he said during the sentencing if the evidence of this horrible abuse was evident and without doubt?
SJWs on their high horses and contradicting previous positions...
