Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
How amazing is it that this guy is so blinded by his agenda that he doesn't realize that this post hurts his position.
If the NFL was willing suspend Reed - a very good pass rusher for a well known squad with a marquee quarterback and recent Lombardi - without a pile of evidence, it's pretty !@#$ing apparent that they'd have suspended Hill if they had anything to work with.
In fact, it suggests pretty strongly that the bar Hill had to clear wasn't just 'not guilty' but rather 'strongly exonerated'.
If the NFL suspended Reed but not Hill, what the hell do you think that says about how that 8 hour hearing went?
But Rosen's too ****ing dense to grasp that very simple conclusion.
|
I am going to keep saying this because it needs to keep being said....
The NFL's Conduct policy is very clear there must be clear evidence of a violation for there to be punishment.
Obviously there was no evidence Hill had violated the policy therefore they could not punish him. Obviously they found evidence Reed did violate the policy.
The system isn't as willy nilly as people believe and Goodell uses 3rd party investigators to give him the info he needs to make decisions.