Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
I think you're getting ahead of yourself by just presuming he'd be better than Ragland.
Like I said, I'm not opposed to bringing him in with no guarantees to try to beat Ragland out for a spot - ****, bring Clay in for a crack at that for all I care.
But don't have any expectations because 30 yr old LBs get pretty slow, pretty fast. Especially guys that were borderline athletes to begin with. We don't operate in an era where Marvcus Patton can hang around into his mid-30s by just slamming into FBs anymore.
If you can't move, you can't play.
|
if he can play and at least tackle in a base 4-3 that's a huge upgrade compared to last year.
I wouldn't offer anything crazy, but a 2.5 million dollar deal for one year is reasonable for a potential starting Mike. We have plenty of cap room.