Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city
I'd keep Dan. I think he's a great 3rd safety. Little expensive sure, but still.
|
Depends - is Spags gonna use a 3rd safety or is Dan strictly box safety insurance?
I don't get the impression that Spags is a 3rd safety guy and in fact, DoD could see that hybrid role more than we expect given Mathieus versatility and the amount of Nickel coverage we're likely to play.
I could see a scenario where Dirty Dan is a little redundant. I agree with you that it's not likely but it's not completely beyond reason either.