Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee
If I were assessing this as a potential party to the matter [as opposed to a media consumer or fan or whatever], I would be developing a hypothesis that the relationship between Brown and the accuser wandered into a gray area between consensual quid pro quo and nonconsensual coercion.
I am not saying what happened, but exploring the possibilities of what facts may come to light given what is already established.
But it seems plausible that Brown asserted a right/privilege to impose his sexual impulses on the accuser, which he then defended after the fact with a blend of 'you didn't stop me' and 'I'm sorry, I'll make it up to you with xxx, yyy, zzz.'
More like a Harvey Weinstein scenario where he isolates her as a sex target by maneuvering his power and resources as an enticement [of sorts] then performs his sexual gratification before an opportunity for refusal or consent arises.
These are not easy transgressions to litigate, and a lot of tangential matters become nearly dispositive when the particulars are so murky.
|
You covered my thoughts very well. Apparently, Brown isn’t too shy about what he texts or how he communicates on social media. There’s is likely a long electronic paper trail that will tell most of the story.
I would be interested in seeing if she confided in any family members or close friends after the incidents through text as well. Those would have a time stamp. They wouldn’t prove anything necessarily, but they would help her case for sure.