Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc
 Did you really just type that out?
That’s like assigning Ryan Leaf to find out who’s been stealing the Oxys.
This(Belichick) is a guy who once tried to injure Marvin Harrison by tripping him during a game in 2004. He’s a scumbag of the highest order and he could have Brown raping a 10 year old on video and still claim that his investigation was “inconclusive”. |
Yes i did. Just reporting the facts . . .
The Pats are and will be investigating.
As some have said in this thread, you really cannot suspend someone right out of the gate and at a minimum one needs to look into the issue. Maybe they might find an eye witness or a video, or something else that will make them feel confident that what happen did indeed happen and they can go from that point.
As for how the Pats are handling it, I will just point you to the Kareem Hunt situation and how your team handle it, as a point of reference.
Feb. 2018 evidence pops up that Hunt is involved with an A&B.
Team KC investigates the situation.
Clark Hunt: "Did you do it?"
Kareem Hunt: "No"
Clark Hunt: "okay good see you at training camp"
Kareem Hunt plays 11 games
Security video pops up showing Hunt pushing and shoving a girl to the ground
NFL places Hunt on Exempt List
Chiefs release Hunt
Now I am not complaining about how KC handled the Hunt situation, but there was an incident reported, KC investigated, and in its opinion let Hunt play 11 games before it was found out that he actually did what was claimed.
The Pats are basically were the Chiefs (& NFL) where with Hunt in Feb. 2018.
No drastic action and lets see how it plays out.
You really cannot complain about another organization 3 days after an alleged incident when your organization let a player play for 11 games.
Fair enough?
Again, I am for letting the things play out then decide, just as KC did with Hunt from Feb. 2018 to Nov. 2018.