Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanBusby
If you had the correct information, yeah you'd have a point.
The Chiefs and NFL attempted to do a proper investigation before Kareem Hunt ever took a single snap after the incident.
They were stonewalled by the Cleveland PD, the Hotel the incident took place at and by the victim that refused to talk with the investigators. The only thing they had to work off of was a vague report and Kareem Hunt telling them that nothing at all had happened. He lied.
Once it was found out what really took place, the Kansas City Chiefs willingly sacrificed the product on the field to do the right thing when they quickly fired Kareem Hunt. There are very key differences when comparing the situations that even idiot Rapetriot fans could figure out if they weren't blind homers.
There's enough evidence, and the victim seems willing to talk in this instance. Letting him practice and prepare for an actual NFL game is as sleazy as it gets and the Patriots are a sleazy team.
Sex crimes players, sex crimes owner and sex crime coach and a Sex Crime enabler running the show. What a toxic environment.
|
I do not think you are understanding my point . . . My issue is not with KC or how it handled the investigation (and thank you for the additional background), but with folks who seem to think that its okay to take action at the initiation of a complaint and put the cart before the horse.
It appears that you seem to have a problem with the pats not suspending Brown before anyone has been interviewed.
This is what i take objection.
KC did not suspend Hunt moment the team first heard about the incident.
Nor should the Pats then suspend Brown at this point in time.
This is my point.
Down the road we can talk, but now lets let things follow the process.
There is a good chance down the road you and I will be in agreement.