Quote:
Originally Posted by Yehoodi
I do not think you are understanding my point . . . My issue is not with KC or it handled the investigation (and thank you for the additional background), but with folks who seem to think that its okay to take action at the initiation of a complaint and put the cart before the horse.
It appears that you seem to have a problem with the pats not suspending Brown before anyone has been interviewed.
This is what i take objection.
KC did not suspend Hunt moment the team first heard about the incident.
Nor should the Pats then suspend Brown at this point in time.
This is my point.
Down the road we can talk, but now lets let things follow the process.
|
I don't think you understand, rape mate.
You seem to think the situations are similar when, in fact, they're not.
To simplify it to where even you can understand: Criminal or civil, it does not matter. If there is credible evidence to back up a serious allegation, which it is a seriously allegation and the evidence looks credible to me, placing an employee on a leave is the appropriate action to take.
Letting your employee still work because "bah gawd we gotta beat da Miahmeh Doolphens" is the wrong way to handle the allegations.
From Antonio Bryant, to Albert Haynesworth, to the star QB playing tonsil hockey with children to the Head Coach willfully employing a rape guy as his Defensive Coordinator down to the owner financially supporting Sex Trafficking. What a gross organization.
Stop trying to twist your reasoning to tell yourself that it's okay to support your piece of shit team, owner and Head Coach.