Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanBusby
To simplify it to where even you can understand: Criminal or civil, it does not matter. If there is credible evidence to back up a serious allegation, which it is a seriously allegation and the evidence looks credible to me, placing an employee on a leave is the appropriate action to take.
|
Yeah, except it does matter. Again, the NFL has NEVER put a player on the Exempt list for a civil matter. Regardless of whether she's a gold-digging liar or he's a psycho rapist, if the NFL has never done that before they're not going to try it now or else the NFLPA will have a bitchfest about it.
Quote:
|
Letting your employee still work because "bah gawd we gotta beat da Miahmeh Doolphens" is the wrong way to handle the allegations.
|
Listen, chucklehead. Most actual Pats fans don't give a flying **** about AB. They think he's a headcase psycho, they think he's too expensive, they think he'll be a fly in the ointment, they don't even think the Pats NEED him on the team because they're already in pretty good shape as shown in game one. If anyone actually thinks what you just said, they're ****ing idiots. Personally, I don't give a shit if he never plays a snap. I just wish they hadn't given him so much cash and given DT to the Jets. But the bottom line is, again, the NFL is not going to Exempt him for a civil case.
Quote:
From Antonio Bryant, to Albert Haynesworth, to the star QB playing tonsil hockey with children to the Head Coach willfully employing a rape guy as his Defensive Coordinator down to the owner financially supporting Sex Trafficking. What a gross organization.
Stop trying to twist your reasoning to tell yourself that it's okay to support your piece of shit team, owner and Head Coach.
|
Antonio Bryant?
Haynesworth was a brief experiment. He didn't last long.
Brady kissed his kid once on camera, he's not a pedophile.
Kraft got a massage, there was no sex trafficking involved.
The HC is not a piece of shit, he's just an asshole.
I understand most of the hatred around here is simply because the Patriots have been dominant for so long. That's how it works. You always hate the dominant team. We hated the Dolphins when they ruled the AFC East. People hated the Cowboys when they were "America's Team". They hated the Steelers. It's the way it goes. But what I really enjoy--and what really shows the lack of character of most of you ****ers--is stuff like "I hope the team plane crashes" and "I hope all Patriots fans die" and all the other shit. It's not our fault that you live in a pathetic podunk middle state that no one gives a **** about, and you root for a team that has routinely failed for decades. I've never seen a fan base so fascinated with another team that isn't even in their division. Just like most Patriots bandwagoners are useless trolls but there are a few intelligent actual fans, this place does have a few actual intelligent fans, and I've even seen those people say they're getting tired of the Patriots fascination. For ****'s sake, you all like to start Patriots threads on a Chiefs board, how pathetic is that?
As for all the chest-beating about how the Patriots dynasty is ending and the Chiefs will reign, blah blah blah... The Patriots have dominated for 20 years and been to 9 Super Bowls. Crowing about how it's going to end is like crowing about about the Roman Empire ended. We don't. ****ing. Care. We've enjoyed 20 years. Of course it's going to end. Of course Brady will retire and Belichick will retire and they'll go back to the pack. But your assumption that it will be because of the Chiefs is a bit premature. The Chiefs had one great season under one young QB. Let's not put him in Canton just yet. You haven't won shit. I've seen countless numbers of you wishing for an injury on Brady, and if karma bites you in the ass...