[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by Giant Octopodes

When did I say it's not that bad? More like someone getting a DUI is not evidence that they're guilty of 1st degree murder later on. Negligence is not the same as malicious intent, and the act in question does not show he's the kind of person capable of raping someone.

Again the guy is far from a saint. If he had hit the kid I'd want him in jail for life, and his actions have readily shown him to be a terrible person. But I'm not the one trying to trivialize rape here, instead I seem to be the only one recognizing it for the heinous act that it is. It takes a special kind of evil to do that to another human, and negligence and petty douschebaggery are not evidence of that evil.

If he's guilty I want him in jail till his dick falls off at a minimum, I think I've been very clear on that. All I'm saying is that his previous actions are in no way evidence of his guilt because they don't display the same kind of malicious evil involved in rape. Find evidence he killed someone, or was previously accused of sexual assault, or anything which shows the same kind of evil and I'm right there with you. Throwing something out a window without looking to make sure the street is clear first is not it. Looking out the window first, seeing a kid there, then throwing something at him in an attempt to kill him would be.

That's a lot of words to say that you condone child endangerment.