I love it how king pussy and the rest of the hindsight brigade criticize Frank Clark not living up to his billing and saying they want the previously employed pass rusher who didn’t live up to his ****ing mega contract years prior.
You criticize Frank Clark? Fine. You don’t like the compensation? Cool neither do I or anyone else.
But for ****s sake. Houston was a 30 year old pass rusher with a damaged knee that didn’t have double digit sacks in ANY of his years on that mega contract. He wasn’t an elite pass rusher since his 2014 contract year.
You think the Chiefs didn’t want the mother****er back? He refused to restructure his deal. Here let me repeat that:
He refused to take a pay cut and restructure his deal.
Quote:
General manager Brett Veach said at the combine "there's a lot of dialogue" in the trade conversations for Houston. The news isn't overly surprising, as the veteran defensive end is due $15.25 million and will count $21.1 million against the salary cap in 2019. Those salary figures -- and his refusal to restructure -- make a trade difficult, so the team may have to decide whether to cut him to save costs.
|
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbs...for-trade/amp/
The guy had a $21.1 million cap hit this year but the market told him he was worth less than 60% of that money.
But hey go ahead and keep bleeding all over the board everyday about it. What do you want to bring up next? That we passed on Aaron Rodgers and Russell Wilson?