Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho
As for matchups/improvements...
The Ravens’ secondary has improved, for sure, from what faced KC.
But Hill is healthy and available and changes a bunch of what a D can do in its secondary. And Hardiman is also Improved - experience - so that’s a big ++ for KC, IMO.
And the Chiefs OL is healthy and better. Eric Fisher makes a huge difference for them, even though he’s merely a slightly better than average LT.
The Ravens’ offense has improved. They’re more versed in their scheme and playing with confidence.
They also may have a limited Mark Ingram. That calf injury is one that may linger.
The Chiefs’ D has improved by leaps and bounds, especially in its DL play and in LB run defense.
The Ravens run 3 WR less than any other team in the NFL. That means KC can live in a 3-Lb set with Ragland on the field if necessary to help the run game. Pennel and Saunders will also be factors and weren’t the first game.
I think KC gains more from being healthy and gains more from in-season improvement than Baltimore (which needed two very fluky won jump balls to even make the first matchup close).
|
Good points.
I truly believe a healthy Chiefs team is stronger than Baltimore. And a problematic matchup in several ways.
My worry is having to beat a team that's thirsty for revenge on the road.