Quote:
Originally Posted by DaFace
OK, this helps to make sense of it a lot:
At least it's not "we played with the numbers a bunch and came up with a new answer!"
|
And yet anytime a public official gets in front of a camera its "why aren't you taking this seriously!?!??
Again - they have a vested interest in saying something other than "man, we really ****ed up..."
I don't see any reason to believe a word of their rationalizations at this point. They stated a presumption of effective social distancing and now they're gonna say "well our definition of 'effective' was 50% compliance..."
Uh huh...