Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
And yet anytime a public official gets in front of a camera its "why aren't you taking this seriously!?!??
Again - they have a vested interest in saying something other than "man, we really ****ed up..."
I don't see any reason to believe a word of their rationalizations at this point. They stated a presumption of effective social distancing and now they're gonna say "well our definition of 'effective' was 50% compliance..."
Uh huh...
|
Do you think that they used a percentage compliance figure in the models? If so, what do you think it was?
I presume that one day, we'll get the chance to see the models.