Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus
It doesn't matter, it wouldn't explain a 20x improvement over the model anyway.
I have no idea why its so hard for some people to admit they totally botched the model.
|
The same guy who yesterday had to be taught about super spreaders is now excoriating a model for ineffectiveness while also not understanding how 90% adherence leads to far, far less growth in a virus that spreads exponentially when not contained.
Consider it this way:
Medical experts told you to stay at home to limit the spread. More people stayed at home than even they anticipated. Consequently, the spread was limited far better than projected.
Yet you're pissed. That is so far beyond ****ed.
__________________
"When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln
|