Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
The same guy who yesterday had to be taught about super spreaders is now excoriating a model for ineffectiveness while also not understanding how 90% adherence leads to far, far less growth in a virus that spreads exponentially when not contained.
Consider it this way:
Medical experts told you to stay at home to limit the spread. More people stayed at home than even they anticipated. Consequently, the spread was limited far better than projected.
Yet you're pissed. That is so far beyond ****ed.
|
A. I am not pissed.
B. I was talking about Missouri exclusively
C. The math used in the original model doesn't add up no matter how much you want to throw irrelevant BS in my face.