Quote:
Originally Posted by DaFace
Sure, if you'd prefer to think of it that way. Either way, you have to make a decision about how many people you're willing to let die in order to get what you want.
|
Uh that's a pretty shitty way of putting it. The question is how many people are you willing to let die before you start causing ancillary harm by trying to keep them alive?
I mean we know people die of the flu every year right? Do we not shut down because we don't care and just want what we want or do we not shut down because the costs of doing so vs. the costs of not doing so are acceptable?
When you say how many people are you willing to let die just to get what you want I am afraid frames the question in a very inaccurate and argumentative light.