Quote:
Originally Posted by ‘ Hamas' Jenkins
In no way is that answering like a politician. That's pretty damned clear.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED
That’s not really simple because you’re not giving a timeline needed for research on all of the stats you’re looking for. All of those numbers will be completely provisional for the next few years. When will you be confident enough in those research numbers? Are you saying you’d feel safe if those numbers lined up today to take a vaccine?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
The studies will have a follow up period. In the case of a dose of an inactivated virus, I'm not terribly concerned. Were it attenuated, a short follow-up would be sufficient as long as cGMP were followed in its production.
It's not a chronic medication and vaccines are remarkably safe for inactivated viruses. Assuming there is nothing novel in its synthesis, the RCT data will give you sufficient info.
|
Never once did you answer the question here. If this isn’t answering like a politician I don’t know what is. Nice of you to leave that part of the conversation out of your example though. It’s not really helping prove your point that you’re withholding some of the information that doesn’t help your case