Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca
Of course their argument is how it's a derogatory American term for Indian leaders...it's a funny word to use in every day conversation, if you call anyone Chief they get super annoyed though.
|
I was just pointing out a major flaw in the argument that was posted. It make no sense. Based upon that the name should stay the same since it has nothing do with indians.
Mecca, I think it's obvious I don't post much and you're actually one of my favorite posters.
This shouldn't be a political term, a derogatory term, or any other ill conceived statement.
I'm home today if you're up to a good discussion.