Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meck
Our normal set is 3 wide, one TE.
Hill, Hardman, Watkins and Kelce.
Hardman's not taking Watkins' snaps. Targets? maybe, some, yeah-but not snaps.
|
I agree. However, that doesn't mean Watkins is the WR2.
You can point out the lack of TD production after Hill got hurt, but some of that is because the double team was on him. I'd also point out that it's not all about TDs and yards. If you can keep moving the chains with 7-8 yard completions, groovy. You also have to look at other things, like downfield blocking. Watkins is much better at that than Hardman. Now, should we pay him long-term like a WR2? I don't think so, but I would like to keep him on the team.