Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk digler
Some of them aren't reliable though and there is a couple that have been approved that sound like they are. Alot of this is on the FDA because they want all the tests to be as accurate as the PCR test because they don't want a bunch of false negatives. They definitely got burned by their stupid antibody decision early on which they have rolled back.
|
So the FDA responds by likely having far more false positives (in terms of actually infectious) then they would have likely had of the false negatives. Public health will always error on the side of caution. That is why they should have been a voice in the room rather than THE voice. Actions impacting all aspects of lives require multiple perspectives IMO.