Quote:
Originally Posted by Donger
Yes, you did imply that. Why else did you decide to try to make a point about the 1.07% IFR in Kansas versus the CDC best estimate (nationally) of .65%?
Again, do you dispute the CDC best estimate IFR of .65% or not? If so, why do you dispute it?
You claimed that my pointing out that that estimate exists is spin. Explain yourself, or be quiet.
|
I pointed out the obvious fact that the 1.07 wasn't accurate, you then tried to argue with me, you then provided evidence it isn't accurate. Feel free to be dumb enough to believe Kansas IFR is almost double the national average for .......reasons.
It went amazingly similar to our last discussion on Europe's spikes that you proved me right on and tried arguing afterwards.