Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRedChief
Sorry man but thats how conversations go in DC. No interest in going down that road. See The Pete and Donger debates for pages in this thread.
Wheres your evidence? How do you define "real"? With all due respect, I just don't want to get into those conversations.
I said these reports are anecdotal which means its not a fact so I'm not having a conversation about defining "real" for something thats not a fact.
|
I have zero idea what DC has to do with this. I am asking an honest and sincere question. When you make a comment like many people don't think its real, it would seem important to define what that means because I dont think its how you are using the term.
It sounds much like the claim is many people still think the virus doesn't actually exist and thats something I disagree with. Yea maybe a very very small %. The truth is many people think its overblown and thats something thats been debated from the start. That dos not = thinking its "not real". Many older people think of it like many other things they have survived in their lifetime and dont want to drastically change their lives over it. Thats somewhat understandable as well even if its a bad idea.
But it sure sounds better to just claim a ton of people think its all fake and we all know why people make that claim.