Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
If it were about legitimate football conversation, they'd actually...you know...entertain other viewpoints.
The rigidity of the arguments suggests they're not here for "discussion" at all.
|
A couple of them weren't trolling. But some of the takes were just odd.
"We're hungrier."
Wtf does that mean? And how would you even know? How do you even evaluate how "hungry" one team is over another?
"We don't like to run."
BS. If they could run the ball effectively, they would, period. Like has nothing to do with it.
And so on. And then some of them call that kind of commentary "analysis."
Well, there's no way you can have a conversation about how "hungry" one team is over another, so . . . ?