Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho
That's really interesting. And by interesting, i mean it's a hilarious combination of hopeful wishes.
White on Hill with no safety help? Good luck with that. Now, if they want to dedicate White and keep both safeties deep, yes, that would limit Hill's impact (though if White is chasing Hill all game, we'll see how his conditioning holds up).
The fact they think Matt Milano is going to stop Kelce this time is freaking hilarious.
I don't understand why they'd think their DL can force Mahomes to do ANYTHING. It isn't that good and couldn't do anything against the Chiefs with the scramble-drill OL in game one.
The Chiefs' secondary is consistently underrated. Lajerius Sneed is going to make as big an impact in this game as Milano returning for them, easily, and more so, IMO.
The only thing that's accurate is that they should be scared of Clyde.
|
I don't know if they think White can actually go 1v1 with Hill, but they seem to think White can hold his own vs. Hill, which is kind of hilarious all by itself.
Yeah, the Kelce thing is just delusional.
But this is a fanbase that was just here yesterday telling us that BUF was "hungrier than the Chiefs." As if you could know that, or that it would make any difference in the actual game.
They think they're more "battle-tested," (how?), and "grittier," (what?) than the Chiefs, and because of these heart-felt, but unquantifiable emotions, they're going to win.
Like any of that is going to make up for the cold, hard facts: they aren't good at stopping the run, and CEH is going to play. They can't cover Kelce. They can't cover Hill. And they can't stop Mahomes from doing Mahomes' things. They can't consistently generate a pass-rush with their DL. And we have the better defense.
They have a good team. But they're still a few pieces away.