Quote:
Originally Posted by Megatron96
The OP specifically said 'assume all are 100% healthy," or whatever.
Given that, and looking at them from the perspective of their abilities as receivers, not their stat lines for a given year, but their actual performance envelopes, Beasley is basically Edelmann Lite, at best.
Watkins is basically Diggs Lite.
No question, Watkins is the better receiver.
|
If we’re talking slot recieved Beasley is better than Watkins, as the X reciever Watkins may have him by a hair.