Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief
I totally agree that if all things are equal and we can choose between a game changing WR, OL, DE or LB @31, we should probably wait to take a LB and trading down would likely be very wise.
Where I disagree is that LB isn’t a valued position because we only use 2 linebackers the majority of the time.
Like...haven’t you guys seen that glaring weakness against teams with balanced attacks? Spags saw Neimann as our best option in those sets.
Think about that for a moment.
Spags saw a complete liability as our best option for a set we use frequently and some of you don’t see that upgrade as a need worthy of the 31st or even our pick in the second.
|
I never said it wasn't a valued position. All positions have value. But some positions have MORE value than others, especially at the end of the 1st round.
LB is near the bottom of the list due to that circumstance alone.