Quote:
Originally Posted by MahomesMagic
Yes, and I was told that I was too high on Trey Lance too.
There is no right or wrong answer on either Allen or Herbert. Herbert had an incredible rookie year. Probably easier to make a case for him.
But there were issues on his tape too, watch the New England game.
Allen put out the following input in his previous 2 years:
Passer Rating of 67 and 85.
Last year was an incredible breakout year but there is a lot to worry about on his tape as well.
Specifically, watch the LAR game 1st half and 2nd half. 1st half mainly zone, 2nd half mainly man (except for long 3rd downs where LAR kept going back to zone).
Watch the Arizona game where they went back and forth from man to zone and in almost all of the man defense moments Allen threw it to the other team 4 or 5 times.
Watch the last 2 playoff games where Allen struggled against simple man from Baltimore and then struggles against man or changes in pre-snap looks from KC.
Allen, when I watch him, is a talented but more scheme dependent QB than a Kyler Murray. I would rather have the guy who has less needs in that area.
Selling Allen and Herbert stock before this year starts.
I don't care about someone who pushes childish hyperbole like yourself. I can defend my opinions without crying like a baby.
|
Yeah im gonna go ahead and say that i've seen your takes and don't give a damn what you think about their "tape".
Beating your chest on Trey Lance who hasn't played a snap?
Saying shit like Allen is more scheme dependent than Murray is ****ing hilarious. Allen IS there scheme. Meanwhile, Murray plays in one of the simplest schemes in the league.
Baltimore and KC both run game plan specific schemes and are widely known amongst pundits for having some of the most unique blitz packages in the league.
You calling them "Simple man" is quite evident on how little you know. Those are the defenses, including NE, that young QB's will find most challenging as they're constantly giving different looks in the secondary.