Quote:
Originally Posted by srvy
Palmer is yaking up pure c and d Florida sunshine up that Donkey ass. Top to bottom better roster than the chiefs? Come on I mean really put down the crack pipe.
|
This shit's getting hilarious.
What do you get when you have a decent roster without a QB or a coach? 2012 Chiefs.
Could they be really good if they added an elite QB and coaching staff? Sure. A lot of teams could.
Even subtracting the QBs, to say their roster is better top to bottom is a huge leap. Their defense may be more talented, but the gap between our offensive roster and theirs is greater than the gap between their defense and ours.
Kelce and Hill are far better than any of their receiving weapons and our O-line is much more talented and deeper. CEH will be better than any of their RBs now that he'll have holes to run through.
So they may have an advantage at WR 3. Cool. That should close the gap.
A lot of these schmucks are only good in theory. Brokedick Miller is at the age when edge rushers fall off a cliff, and he had already started to before the injury. And what the hell has Jeudy done in the NFL besides drop every pass that hit his hands?