Quote:
Originally Posted by loochy
They don't need justification. It's Facebook. They own it and everything you put on it. It's their platform. They can do whatever they want with the information there. Free speech rules do not apply in this situation.
Cool. Someone got paid from the massive, sprawling conglomerate that makes everything from soap to replacement knees to medicine. Also, J&J made the shittiest vaccine anyway. Where are the Moderna and Pfizer fact checkers? Astra Zeneca? Sinopharm? Sputnik V?
Plus who cares (because it's Facebook)?
You sure about that? All of the other NUMEROUS studies show the exact opposite. Maybe you should link the study you're talking about.
Ok, some guy said it. Cool.
How do you know deaths have been vastly under reported to VAERS? Do you have your own personal vaccine side effect tracking system that shows differently?
It's cool that you just state a bunch of unsubstantiated stuff with no links, then say "wake the **** up, people."
At least MahomesMagic, as tiresome as his shtick is getting, almost always backs up his claims with data.
It's also funny that you seem to regard Facebook as some holy bastion of truth and free speech. It's a social media/influencing/engineering/data mining tool that is owned by a company. They can do what they want to their site.
|
Renz said that under penalty of perjury and it has sparked a lawsuit.
Facebook's legal right to censor isn't the point. You don't see a problem with shutting down people's ability to share their side effects? There's no rational justification for it and it's a bad look. Why can't people just admit this?