Quote:
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar
And therein lies the problem. You guys are so invested in the media-driven narrative that you won’t even listen to other possibilities.
Studies have shown that it only takes about 6 weeks of propagandizing to thoroughly brainwash a population and ruin their ability to see reason. And at that point, nothing they’re presented with will change their mind. If that isn’t playing out before our eyes...
Hell, earlier in this thread somebody suggested that people with PhDs have less common sense than those with lesser degrees as an attempt to explain why PhDs are less likely to take the vaccine.
The nonsense that’s been thrown at us for the last 16 months should be laughed at and treated like comedy. A farce. But no one’s laughing.
|
I don't understand where you're disagreeing with what I'm saying.
If I was a public health official, I'd be pushing information where it can do the most good.
I'd push treatment information into the hands of medical providers because that's where they're going to do the most good.
I'd push prevention information into the hands of the public because that's where they're going to do the most good.
Do you agree with that? If so, you don't need treatment information to be pushed in the general public. That information is going out through industry sources and health care employers. In fact, if I'm being really strategic (and maybe a little cunning) I don't want the public to know about treatment protocols because if they're comfortable getting treated, it could distract them from their more productive path toward prevention.
As an analogy, if you developed a great treatment protocol for diabetes, that's great. But the better thing is still to keep people from getting diabetes in the first place, so you still want the prevailing message to the public to be about eating right and exercising. You don't really want the message to be, "Yeah, it's not a big deal if you get diabetes because we've now figured out how to make it not kill you."