View Single Post
Old 09-25-2021, 07:18 PM   #73
dlphg9 dlphg9 is offline
MVP
 
dlphg9's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2010
Casino cash: $1839653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallcrawler View Post
You are a ****ing idiot, end of story. I, among MANY others were very willing to trade Jones if he wanted to be top dog in money. The guy had earned top dog money, and i fully expected him to pursue it, as most NFL players MUST do, given their short careers. You pounded your chest that we absolutely must give it to him if he demanded, and i disagreed.

PERIOD.

He worked with the team, got himself a nice payday, and proceeded to do **** all when it mattered most since then, but at the time i was quite happy that he worked with KC to stay.

Now hes off to a shit start because his idiot coaches think he can play DE. He cant. Your spank bank boy is a deer in the headlights out there. The guy was suspect against the run inside, and completely worthless against it outside.

If you think my pointing out that he and the rest of that highest paid in the league d line are sucking frothy ****ing ass for two games is rooting for failure, well like i said, youre a ****ing idiot.

I dont root for failure, it ****ing pisses me off. The Ravens are destroyed by injury, with a halfback playing qb. We should have destroyed that team, but in typical Chiefs fashion, we want to bullshit around and play down to the competition.

Then with the game on the line we run a give up play instead of unleashing Mahomes on them. You know, like Harbaugh did to us with Jackson because he trusts his RBQB more than Andy trusts Mahomes apparently.

From the previous 17 rushes we saw, the outcome was highly likely that it would be no gain, minimal gain, or a loss.

When you see the ****ing defensive alignment that handoff was looking at, the fact that we went through with it is doubly offensive.

If you want Clyde to have the ball game on the line hey good for you.

I say we give it to the dude with the half billion dollar deal, and the sac to deliver the ****ing goods.
Also you must not have actually watched the game, because Clyde had several decent runs before the fumble.

9, 1, 7, -1, 3, 9, 4, 7, 6, 1, 4, -2

Those were his 12 rushes before he fumbled like a Wallcrawler. 8 out of his 12 (75%) previous runs would have gotten a 1st down. So idk why you said"from the previous 17 rushes we saw, the outcome was highly likely that it would be no gain, minimal gain, or a loss.", because you're wrong. You act as if they completely stuffed the run game and they clearly didn't.

Dumb ****
Posts: 17,012
dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.
    Reply With Quote