Quote:
Originally Posted by comochiefsfan
Yes
|
I know players can be written off too early, but there are a lot of players people decided had made it far too quickly. Sneed had a good rookie year but in a limited role with few snaps. He's been asked to do more and he's just not been good, I don't know how anyone sees otherwise. There's a whole load of picks and additions that have been a backward step or at least have failed to provide value.
Brown - average to poor as a LT
Niang - the same at RT, but in his defence it's early days
Hardman - gadget player
CEH - average to poor
Reed - awful
Hughes and Baker - cheap but we've got what we paid for them
And then there's a whole load of players who could be decent but we really don't know and there's as much average as good on film now - Gay, Thornhill, Sneed, Saunders
Which of our picks over the past couple of years have really consistently performed well and improved the team? Which additions have elevated the team. I've sympathy for Veach given the cap situation, but given he oversaw that situation with some of massive contracts he's handed out, it's on him.
It's not on him that players look completely confused pre-snap, but I don't see anyway we can say this roster hasnt regressed.