Quote:
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar
Due to one turnover in the middle of the game? They couldn't put a drive together at the end.
It's a little different when you're talking about 4 TOs to 0, or a fumble when you're already in position for a game-winning FG.
|
Absolutely, it was the timing of it. Cleveland was marching down the field going to go up by double digits again. And they fumbled. So yes, that was a big factor in why the Chiefs won that game. Had they gone down by double digits again, I bet the chances were very slim the Chiefs could have come back from that. That's the thing, everybody is so quick to say because of the turnovers this and that, but again, it goes both ways.