Quote:
Originally Posted by NotDonger
I'm not. I'm pointing out that if the definition of a "leaky" vaccine is that is does not provide 100% efficacy (e.g., sterilizing immunity), all vaccines are "leaky" since no vaccines provide 100% efficacy.
Is that your definition of a "leaky" vaccine?
|
So the question has to be. How effective does a vaccine have to be at preventing diseases or transmission to be considered non leaky?
What is the cutoff number? I think everyone can admit that the vaccines pre booster did not prevent infection or transmission at the efficiency of the other vaccines mentioned.