Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
Make A mistake? Sure.
But...
The guy got into two violent altercations at bars in 2018 prior to the incident.
He then got involved in the incident.
When asked about it - prior to to the video evidence revealing itself - he lied about what happened.
I'm not sure how many people you've managed in your life, but when an employee lies about something of consequence, and when that employee already has this checkered very recent history, and when that employee lies directly about it and makes it impossible for you to do any potential damage control ahead of time, it doesn't seem like an unreasonable decision to terminate his employment.
Earlier you said he was picked up "almost immediately." What??? It was months later that the Browns finally signed him.
And re: his time in Cleveland, did you just forget about getting caught speeding with an open bottle of vodka and weed? Does that sound like someone who is still making the right decisions?
And these are things we KNOW about him. How many incidents do you imagine have been covered up by the Chiefs or Browns or Hunt himself that we're not aware of?
There was nothing wrong with releasing him. It sucked then and it sucks now, but from an employer's perspective, you can absolutely see why that was done.
|
And there it is.
It was the right decision based solely on what the general public knew - but people continue to think they know all the details that factored into the decision like they are inside the locker room, or present for all conversations involved.
To quote
Major League
"This guy (Hunt) is dead"
"Cross him off, then"
He's gone, ain't coming back, it's been years. Grow the **** up already.