Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDayz
Have any "steered/influenced" deniers explained why the league offers no evidence that there's a process where officials are judged, reviewed, held accountable for the quality of their work (for made calls and unmade calls), and if there is a process why it's kept a secret?
EDIT: In b4 - Because it's a hard job and it's not a good idea to let people know these part-time employees are being questioned.
|
Sports Illustrated did an article about the process a number of years ago.
I think they were actually doing a story on a specific referee, and he was walking them through the process of how they get games assigned to them and how they are reviewed after each performance.
My guess is if you were to look for the process you wouldn't have to dig too deep.