Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus
Our run game was actually pretty baller that night. If you take away Mahomes and Allen's runs, the Chiefs rushed for 113 and the Bills 41. Chiefs went for 5.7 YPC and the Bills went for 3.2.
I saw some dude on Reddit or Facebook the other day who claimed WASP wasn't a good play by Mahomes because Hill was wide open. People just see what they want to see and that's what you sound like right now.
You're ignoring the fact that Allen's #1 target in Diggs was completely blanked by Ward. Dude had like 7 yards or something. As I mentioned earlier, the Bills running game also wasn't nearly as good as KC's.
Of course they punted more than we did. Their offense was the Josh Allen and Gabe Davis show. Are you expected to score on every drive when your ground game only averages 3 YPC and your #1 receiver can only muster 7 yards on 3 targets?
The bolded also isn't true. Mahomes targeted Hill on 29% of his passes that night while Allen only targeted Davis on 27% of his passes.
It's not a big difference, I'd agree, but I think Pat's got the better supporting cast.
Chiefs RBs=Bills RBs
Chiefs OL>Bills OL
Kelce>Knox
Hill>Diggs
Beasley>Pringle
Sanders=Hardman
Gabe Davis>Robinson
I think the big difference, again, is that Kelce and Hill are both HoF talents. They're better at the bottom but we're far better at the top.
|
Regardless of the "supporting casts", Buffalo objectively had the better defense all season, and it wasn't even close.